LIBERTY INFINITY

Я хочу умереть в лесу
Своим телом кормить лису
И её несмышлёных лисят
Они голодны – пусть едят

Или пусть из открытых ран
Моей крови напьётся вран
В ночь, когда соберётся гроза
Пусть он выклюет мне глаза

И глазниц моих яблоки скользкие
Пусть насадят ежи на иголки
Задыхаясь от удовольствия
Моё сердце пусть выгрызут волки

В моих рёбрах пускай муравьи
Муравейники строят свои
Белый череп на чёрной земле
Пусть убежищем служит змее

Или пусть через мой живот
Лучше дерево прорастёт
Станет кроной моя голова
И на мне будет жить сова

Я хочу умереть в лесу
Своим телом кормить лису
И её несмышлёных лисят
Они голодны – пусть едят

Сибирская язва (Siberian Ulcer)

The only explanation I have regarding zero absorbing all other numbers in calculations like 1*0=0 is that zero=death that eats matter. ~ Vika Magnitskaya

My full article about zero is here.

About first push of life energy. In Abrahamic religions it’s God who starts life via Adam (a copy of God) (was he an androgin\hermaphrodite i wonder?) so next the diсhotomy starts with Eve and even more with their children later.

So here the question is…this inicial energy say it’s 100% of energy given by God to Adam and Eve, do they share it equally? after childbirth say 50% stays in parents and 33% goes to each of their 3 children… Kain, Avel and Sif. And the question to the death of Avel, did his 17% returned to Adam and Eve?

I calculate this because of the explanation of Bert Hellinger (former Christian missionary in Africa – this is important cos in Africa they still have cannibalism).

So, he said.. imagine how life flows through your parents in you and after through you to your children. This energy flow goes through hearts of parents (staying together) through their children (stayin in front of them) and will be passed through grandchildren (stayin in front of them) and so on.

This sounds right if we talk about lineage, of traditional approach of regular families with childbirth. It also proves synergy, cos giving birth parents maintain their initial energy, cos the child doesnt suck 50% of their living forces, but somehow gets own energy. We dont see depressed abulia anhedonia parents.. many are full of energy even with multiple childbirthes.

Scientists also contradict the origin of humanity from 2 first people, saying humans have several origin sources ww.

So, what i want to say.. Abrahamiс religions’ origin (Genesis) is questionable and based on the easiest idea that comes to the head of everyone. And Family Constellations of Bert Hellinger are also questionable, cos are based on Christianity standards, not scientific researches.. but, anyway, Bert Hellinger was a psychological superstar… and its a pity when i see nowadays Constellations psychologies explaining them via ezoteric and unproved energy fields round humans, which contain and reflect all the info about the person.

But, anyway, Jung’s collective unconscious is also scientifically unproved, but everyone feels it.

Actually Constellations mean stable structure of stars in chaotic night sky… and Hellinger’s or Jung’s constellations are an attempt to find stable structures (explanations) in the chaos of life.

Vika Magnitskaya

P.S. I got a diploma on Religion Studies)) ^..^

Ночь снова здесь… всё явь иль нет?
Вопрос об этом и есть ответ.

Night is here again… is this all real or not?
The world is a snap, a scene forgot.
The sounds are dull, the shapes are flat
I move, but no one feels all that.

The glass is cold, the sky is shit,
I pinch my skin – I feel no heat.
A ghost who walks through waking sleep,
Where nothing’s deep enough to keep.

Night is here again.. is this all real or not?
This question is all the truth I’ve got.

15\08\2026

There are about 6 million registered Palestinian refugees. Under Islamic law, zakat (an obligatory charity contribution) is required from Muslims in all countries to support the poor people and those who in need. In addition, the Prophet Muhammad repeatedly stressed the importance of helping orphans and socially unprotected people.

Considering these religious obligations, a question arises: why wealthy Muslim nations (such as Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates), not invite and absorb on own territories all Palestinian refugees?

The unreadiness of these Arab countries to accept large-scale refugee populations is not primarily due to a lack of financial capacity or available zakat funds. Instead, it is driven by a complex set of political, strategic, and economic ideas: 1. geopolitical disbalance of moving a nation to the new place. 2. Destabilization of local security. 3. Economic loss.

But the most important reason they dont take refugees is that moving them to new place will automatically give Israel all the former Palestinian lands.

This situation raises a fundamental question: are these nations prioritizing geopolitical interests and regional influence over immediate, direct humanitarian assistance to their fellow Muslims in need as Muhammad said ^..^