Archive for the ‘science’ Category

zero multiplication proof
zero multiplication argument

The only explanation I have regarding zero absorbing all other numbers in calculations like 1*0=0 is that zero=death that eats matter~ Vika Magnitskaya

My full article about zero is here.

People now are just placeholders for what hasn’t been computerized yet.

People now are just placeholders for what hasn’t been computerized yet.

People now are just placeholders for what hasn’t been computerized yet.

~ Vika M.

Gottfrid Svartholm Warg, a Swedish computer specialist and co-founder of the BitTorrent and file-sharing site The Pirate Bay
Gottfrid Svartholm Warg, a Swedish computer specialist and co-founder of the BitTorrent and file-sharing site The Pirate Bay, sitting in an unconventional, highly cluttered workspace lined with reflective foil.

The foil is epic! ^..^ I wonder if he is also interested in the question of whether vampires are real or not.
 

Since childhood, I couldn’t understand why multiplying a whole number by zero gives zero. I think it should result in that very whole number. Mathematicians explain it by saying that 0 × 5 = 0 because zero is taken five times… and 5 × 0 = 0, somehow, because 5 is taken zero times, and here for some reason the 5 doesn’t remain, but again a 0 appears as the result… This is what I don’t understand. I think mathematics needs a new branch, where 5 × 0 = 5, not 0. It seems to me that a five taken zero times remains a five, not zero. I also think this branch should be applied to all subsequent calculations, sort of splitting mathematics into 5 × 0 = 5 and 0 × 5 = 0. It also seems to me that mathematics should be split into two branches: 5 × 0 = 5 and 0 × 5 = 0, thereby violating the fundamental mathematical rule of commutativity – Changing the order of the factors does not change the product

C детства не могла понять, почему если целое число умножить на ноль, то получается ноль? Я думаю, что должно получиться это же умножаемое число. В школе мне это объяснили тем, что 0х5=0 потому что ноль взяли пять раз.. а 5х0=0 это почему-то потому, что 5 взяли 0 раз и почему-то не осталось 5, а появился 0 в результате… вот это вот мне не ясно, я думаю, что в математике нужна новая ветка, в которой 5х0=5 а не 0. Мне кажется, что пятерка, которую взяли 0 раз, останется пятеркой, а не нулем. Мне также кажется, что нужно раздвоить математику на 5х0=5 и 0х5=0 и сделать исключение из фундаментального математического правила “От перемены мест слагаемых сумма не меняется”.

Вот что сказал deepseek:

EARTH AFTER NUCLEAR
Vika Magnitskaya

WHY

Punctuated evolution, creationism
Punctuated evolution, creationism

Yesterday I realized that I think about solipsism very often. I think that I cling to the idea that life is one and that this historical passage is universal for all incarnations. I feel there’s nothing to be found in science except for space travel and the evolution of cyborgs. So that will be it for the next 40 years, if I survive… So yesterday I was listening to a lesson about the pre-historical period of humanity and found out that humans have millions of years of history, but Homo sapiens only about 40,000 years of history… I really can’t understand such huge numbers. I think that a person, even during a 30-year lifespan (as was before), could have invented seed growing and animal domestication within a single lifetime. Yet scientists say there were millions of years of evolution. In moments like this, I feel this information is like a bug on the prism of my solipsism, very close, like in The Matrix. And in this bug, all the people around me somehow believe it and don’t doubt it.

the Matirx cocon solipsism
Who eats more sheep - shepherd or wolves?
Religions or Atheism?